Suehan High Cliff

SUMERTA WINAYA ASNADI

Peguyangan High cliff

SUMERTA WINAYA ASNADI

Pasih Uug

SUMERTA WINAYA ASNADI

Canyon stone Hills

SUMERTA WINAYA ASNADI

Celagilandan Beach

SUMERTA WINAYA ASNADI

Penida Beach

SUMERTA WINAYA ASNADI

Sun Marine Fish

SUMERTA WINAYA ASNADI

The Use of Questions in Improving Students' Reading Comprehension

06.37 |



The Use of Questions in Improving Students Reading Comprehension
I Wayan Sumerta Winaya Asnadi
NIM. 1312021146
English Education Department of UNDIKSHA

ABSTRACT
This article aims at reviewing the use of question which has significant effect in improving students reading comprehension. The nature of reading comprehension, the types of reading comprehension, and also the purposes of reading comprehension are explored in this article. In addition, questions, including the nature, types and the importance of questions also take important role in supporting the topic in the following discussion. Finally, this article reviewing the function of questions type and the way how to ask question for the students in improving students reading comprehension as well as the purposes of this review article.
Keywords: questions, importance of questions, reading comprehension
INTRODUCTION
            Learning is a process of acquiring knowledge or developing the ability to perform new behaviors. In relation with learning, teaching cannot be defined apart from learning (Nathan Gage, 1964). It is one of many ways how to educate students in language learning. In teaching, students will learn in formal way, besides in informal way. Teaching can be defined as the activities which are intended to bring about language learning. Language teaching is more widely interpreted than instructing a language class. Of course, there are four basic aspects of language that should be mastered by the students namely listening, speaking, reading, and writing. In this article, we will concern on the reading aspect especially reading comprehension in language learning as our discussion.
            Some years ago, many experts had found some methods that were used to teach the students in language learning especially in reading class. The view through teaching reading comprehension has been dramatically changed in the past decades. Uso and Martinez (as cited in Khatib & Nasrollahi, 2012) discussed the significant views regarding teaching reading comprehension.  As suppose the use of question in reading to improve students’ ability in comprehending the skill in reading aspect.  Barr et.al. (2007) also believe that the use of questions in instruction has significant effect on development of students strategies in reading comprehension.
            Some studies show that, there are some important uses of question for the students in comprehending the reading text. As noted by Day and Park (2005), the use of questions is an integral aspect of such activities, and in their experiences as language teachers they have seen that well-designed comprehension questions help students interact with the text to create or construct meaning. Day and Park (2005) believe that it is critical that teachers help their students create meaning by using questions. Therefore, the use of question in improving students reading comprehension becomes the topic which is discussed in this review article as well as the purpose of this article.
THE NATURE OF READING
            Reading is an aspect of language learning. It is an effective way to learn because it is important for enriching our lives (Barr et al., 2007). Barr and her colleagues define that reading is an interactive process with text. Celce-Murcia et al. (as cited in Khatib & Nasrollahi, 2012) believe that the ability to read in a second language is the most important way for autonomous language learning. In addition, Alptekin (as cited in Khatib & Nasrollahi, 2012) defined reading as an interaction of the reader’s text-based and knowledge-based processes.          Therefore, reading is an aspect of language learning which permits the students to get information especially in reading text by constructing their background knowledge. Due to this case, according to National Reading Panel (as cited in Vacca, et al. 2009) one of five essential components of an effective reading program is reading comprehension. Hence then, in this article, we will elaborate more regarding to reading comprehension as follows.
Reading Comprehension
            Before we define further the meaning of reading comprehension, it is better to know the definition of comprehension. Comprehension, according to Huey (as cited in Vacca et al., 2008) is “thought-getting and thought manipulating.” It is also viewed as a process of social construction (Bakthin in Vacca et al., 2008). In addition, Vacca et al. (2008) note comprehension as the thing that the reader alredy knows (commonly reffered to prior knowledge), what the author’s supplies, and the strategies the reader employs text. Therefore, comprehension is the process of making sense of words, sentences and connected text.
            Reading comprehension is also included into receptive skill besides listening. Receptive skill is the way in which people extract meaning from the discourse they see or hear (Harmer, 2001, as cited in Khatib & Nasrollahi, 2012). To achieve the purpose of reading especially reading comprehension, which is to get general or detail information from the text, students have to comprehend the text in order to understand the information effectively. Gillet and Temple (1998, as cited in Khatib & Nasrollahi, 2012) claimed that “Comprehension is the understanding new information in light of what we have already known”. This thing will make students be more successful in applying and improving everything that had been learned and understood.
            Other theory also gives the view regarding to reading comprehension. It is the process of using syntactic, semantic, and rhetorical information found in the printed texts to reconstruct in the reader’s mind, using the knowledge of the world he or she possesses (Ngadiso, 1998, as cited in Khatib & Nasrollahi, 2012).In processing texts, readers combine literal comprehension, based on lower-level cognitive processes of reading such as lexical access and syntactic parsing, with inferential comprehension, based on higher-level cognitive processes such as the text base of comprehension (to understand what the text says) and the situation model of interpretation (to understand what it is about)”.  
            Traditionally as Chastain (as cited in Khatib & Nasrollahi, 2012) mentioned reading comprehension was viewed as a passive skills because readers do not produce anything; however readers are in constant interaction with reading passage and their background knowledge.
            Reading comprehension focuses on reading as a thinking process where the reader reconstructs the intended meaning of the author. Readers are not treated as passive one, but they are cognitively engaged in processing the author’s intended meaning.
Types of Reading Comprehension
In the following section, there are four types of reading comprehension according to Hall (1983) namely: reading for information, reading for ideas, reading for escape, and reading for engage.
Reading for Information
            The first type of reading is reading for information. Hall noted that reading for information is a kind of reading which concerns on the information the readers want to get. He believe that, reading for information is the same with quick eye reading which is necessity to the readers who want to keep up with what's happening or learn much of what has happened in the past (Hall, 1983).
Reading for Ideas
            Reading for ideas is a type of reading in which the readers summarize key ideas, sentence by sentence or paragraph by paragraph (Hall, 1983).
Reading to Escape
            According to Hall (1983) reading to escape is a types of reading in which the readers focus on personal reactions to the reading or to summarize plot. The reader is in control, able to stop reading a glance away or superimpose his own daydreams.
Reading to Engage
            As noted by Hall (1983), reading to engage is a type of reading in which the purpose is to find emotional center (what is at stake). In this case, there are some ways to be conducted, namely note literary conventions, repetitions, and related ideas. In addition, this type of question also identifies things confusing or strange. Furthermore, reading to engage is also involving summarizes or paraphrases whole.


The Purposes of Reading Comprehension
            Reading is one of the most important skills for mastery of a foreign language (Khatib & Nasrollahi, 2012). Hunt (as cited in Hermida, 2009) reading is a process shaped partly by the text, partly by the reader's background, and partly by the situation the reading occurs. Reading has a purpose to enrich the readers’ lives (Barr et al., 2007). Reading is a skill which enables us to get a message; recognizing the written words (written symbols); getting (understanding) the meaning; used to teach pronunciation; and grasping information from texts. In addition, Hall (1983) suggested that the type of reading comprehension is differed by its purposes, as such to get the information as well as the ideas, reading for escape, and also reading for engage.
            Mullis et.al (2006: 19-20) also suggest that, there are two purposes of reading comprehension, namely reading for literary experience and reading to acquire and use information. In literary reading, the reader engages with the text to become involved in imagined events, setting, actions, consequences, characters, atmosphere, feelings, and ideas, and to enjoy language itself. For young readers, literature offers the opportunity to explore situations and feelings they have not yet. While in reading for information, the reader engages not with imagined worlds, but with aspects of the real universe. Through informational texts, one can understand how the world is and has been, and why things work as they do.
            Due to reading comprehension, Blachowicz and Ogle (as cited in Barr et.al. 2007) state that the process of making meaning is constructive one in which the readers connect what he or she already knows to information and cues applied by the author in text. Significant reading comprehension is what the reader already know (commonly reffered to as prior knowledge), what the author supplies, and the strategies the readers employ and construct something meaningful through interaction or transaction with the text.
            Thus, reading comprehension is an important skill that must be mastered by all people especially the students to construct their understanding about the information in the text. This aspect of language learning becomes more highly needed when the students try to comprehend the reading text.
THE NATURE OF QUESTION
            What is question? What is the purpose of question? According Cotton (1988) question is any sentence which has an interrogative form or function. Question is a sentence, words, or phrase to ask information (Oxford, 2010). In addition, question is a task or request for information that is intended to test the knowledge or understanding, for example in an exam or a competition. Adam (2009) defines that question is invigorating thinking, learning, action, and results. For more than two thousand years (since Socrates) the question has been an integral part of teaching. The ability to ask and answer questions is central to learning. Thus, question is type of sentence which has interrogative form, usually used to ask something related to reading text.
The Importance of Question
            As discussed in the previous section, question is a task or request for information that is intended to test the knowledge or understanding, for example in an exam or a competition. Based on that definition, the significant of question is to generate access, extend or refine knowledge. It is an interpersonal exchange aimed at achieving a knowledge purpose to help students and children to think in generative and complex ways.
            Adam (2009) proposed that the purposes of question in organizational, business, and professional contexts, and in roles such as leader, manager, mentor, coach, consultant, mediator, and educator, is very necessary. The value of questions becomes apparent by realizing how many everyday reasons we have asking for. The purposes of question according to Adam (2009) are as follows. Gather information; lay groundwork for answers and solutions; think critically, creatively, and strategically; learn and reflect (including critical reflection); uncover and challenge assumptions; solve problems and make decisions; clarify and confirm listening; build and maintain relationships and collaboration; negotiate and resolve conflicts; set goals as well as develop strategy; create, innovate, and open new possibilities; catalyze productive and accountable conversation and action.
            Day also states that questions have been used for a wide variety of educational purposes such as: reviewing previously read or studied material; diagnosing student abilities, preferences, and attitudes; stimulating critical thinking; managing student behavior; probing student thought process; stirring creative thinking; personalizing the curriculum; motivating students; assessing student knowledge and determining if students understand the tasks they must complete or processes they are to follow.  Hence then, it can be inferred that, question is very necessary in order to improve the reading comprehension for reading text.
The Types of Question
            According to Day & Park (2005) there are six types of question which are used to test students’ comprehension in reading text. They present and discuss five forms that comprehension questions may take to stimulate students' understanding of texts. For the clear definition, the following are the explanation for each type of question.
Yes/no Questions
            Yes/no questions are simply questions that can be answered with either yes or no. This type of question is usually used to ensure the students understanding about the text given. E.g. Is this article about discussing reading comprehension? This is a common form of comprehension question, but it has the drawback of allowing the student a 50% chance of guessing the correct answer (Day & Park 2005).  So when using yes/no questions, it is better to following up with other forms of questions to ensure that the student has understood the text.
             Day and Park believe that yes/no questions can be used to prompt all six types of comprehension.  When yes/no questions are used with personal response or evaluation, other forms of questions seem to follow readily. For example: Did you like this article?  Why?
The follow-up questions may be more useful in helping students than the initial yes/no questions.


Alternative Questions
            Day & Park (2005) propose that alternative questions are two or more yes/no questions connected with “or”. See the following example.
Does this article focus on the use of questions to teach reading comprehension or to test reading comprehension? 
            Similar to yes/no questions, alternative questions are subject to guessing, so the teacher may want to follow up with other forms discussed in this section. Alternative questions have worked best for us with literal, reorganization, inference, and prediction types of comprehension. 
True or False Questions
            Questions may also take the form of true or false.  While true or false questions are found frequently in commercially available materials, there is a potential danger in relying exclusively on them.  As with yes/no questions, students have a 50% chance of guessing the correct answer (Day & Park, 2005). Teachers might simply accept a right answer, failing to ask why the answer is correct or the distracters (the wrong choices) are not correct. An example of a true or false question focusing on literal comprehension is:
Is this statement true or false?
            Day & Park (2005) believe that the use of well-designed comprehension questions will help students become better readers. True or false questions are difficult to prepare.  The false answers must be carefully designed so as to exploit potential misunderstandings of the text.  False answers that are obviously incorrect do not help teach comprehension because students do not have to understand the text to recognize them as incorrect. 
            True or false questions may also be hard to write because sometimes, as written, both answers are plausible, regardless of the degree of comprehension of the text. Like yes/no questions, true or false questions can be used to prompt all six types of comprehension.  When used with personal response or evaluation, follow-up tasks are sometimes necessary.  To illustrate, a personal response question about this article might be: Is this statement true or false?  I like this article.  Explain your choice.
Wh- Questions
            Questions beginning with where, what, when, who, why, and how (5W1H) are commonly called wh-questions. Day & Park (2005) found that they are excellent in helping students with a literal understanding of the text, with reorganizing information in the text, and making evaluations, personal responses and predictions.  They are also used as follow-ups to other questions forms, such as yes/no and alternative. In particular, wh- questions with how/why are often used to help students to go beyond a literal understanding of the text.  As beginning and intermediate readers are often reluctant to do this, using how/why questions can be very helpful in aiding students to become interactive readers.
Multiple-choice
            Multiple-choice questions are based on other forms of questions. They can be, for example, a wh-question with some choices: See the following example.
When was Johnny born?
a. 1944
b. 1945
c. 1946
d. 1947
            Generally, but not always, this form of question has only one correct answer when dealing with literal comprehension (Day & Park , 2005). The multiple-choice format may make wh-questions easier to answer than no-choice wh-questions because they give the students some possible answers.  Students might be able to check the text to see if any of the choices are specifically discussed, and then make a choice.
            Multiple-choice questions may be used most effectively, in literal comprehension.  They can also be used with prediction and evaluation.  However, when used for these types of comprehension, Day & Park (2005) suggest to using follow-up activities that allow students to explain their choices. As with true or false questions, developing good multiple-choice questions requires careful thought. Therefore, Day & Park (2005) found that developing a question with four choices works best for students with low proficiency in the target language.  One of the four, obviously, is the desired answer; the others should be seemingly plausible responses.
            Besides that, the types of question which is proposed by Hall, Vacca et.al (2008) also suggest some types of question in reading comprehension strategies according to the way how to answer the questions. Traditionally there are three types of question namely literal questions, inferential questions, and evaluative questions. Literal questions mean students answer the questions by using the information explicitly or clearly stated in the text. Then, inferential questions are the questions in which students answer the questions  by using their prior knowledge along with the informaion from the text. Finally, evaluative questions are the questions in which students answer the questions with the judgments they make about what they have read.
The Procedure of Asking Question in Reading Text
                Many theories discuss the procedure of asking questions in reading text by some ways. Generally there are three ways in asking question in reading text such as asking questions before reading, while reading, and after reading. But, some decades ago, Dolores Durkin's research in 1979 showed that most teachers asked students questions after they had read, as opposed to questioning to improve comprehension before or while they read (as cited in Vecca et.al., 2008).
            In the late 1990s, further research (Pressley, et al. 1998 in Day) revealed that despite the abundance of research supporting questioning before, during, and after reading to help comprehension, teachers still favored post-reading comprehension questions. The weakness is that, Vecca et.al. (2008) note asking questions after reading often led struggling readers to feel that the purposes of reading is to answer the questions that will be given by the teachers. Thus, it will build a substance of reading is to answer the questions, not to comprehend the text.
            The second way to improve reading comprehension is by asking the students while they are reading the text. Modeling questions asking while reading is significant because it can encourage students to ask themselves. In addition, Beck et al. propose that asking question while reading is necessary in order to make the students thinking deeply and constructing meaning about segments of text they read (cited in Vecca et al., 2008). Even the students keep their minds active while reading as they engage.
            At last, asking questions before students read the text is also important strategy in enhancing students reading comprehension. It helps students to think more strategically about reading the text (Vecca et al., 2008). Asking questions before reading text means that, before reading the text, students will be raised up with questions which lead their thought to the goal intended by the questions. Hence then, students will manage the strategy to achieve the objective of reading before reading the text.
            In sum, to help students comprehend the reading text, it is critical that teachers ask questions before, during, and after reading. It emphasizes that even though you are an adult reader, questions before, during, and after reading continue to help you gain an understanding of the text you are reading.
CONCLUSION
From the above discussion, it can be concluded that reading is an important aspect in language learning because of its purposes. Hence then, reading is necessarily to be taught in language learning by using some techniques. Due to this case, questioning become the appropriate technique for reading text. Questions are actually plays significant roles in improving students’ ability especially in reading. In addition, by asking questions before, during, and after reading is necessary in improving students reading comprehension. Questions becomes are highly needed and used in teaching language learning especially for improving students reading comprehension.
REFERENCES
Adam, M. (2009). The Practical Primacy of Questions in Action Learning. Action Learning and Its Applications, Present and Future , 4-6.
Anonymous. (2013). www.pendidikanbahasainggris.com. Retrieved December      18,       2015, from www.pendidikanbahasainggris.com: http://www.pendidikanbahasainggris.com/2013/10/definition-of-reading-           according-some.html#ixzz3uGZlDcMgBarr, R., Blachhowiz, C., Bates,      A.,
Beatty, K. (2008). Read and Think, A reading Strategies Course. Hongkong:          Pearson Longman Asia ELT.
Cotton, K. (1988). Clasroom Questioning. United States: North West Regional     Educational Laboratory.
Day, M. L. (n.d.). Retrieved December 30, 2015, from         www.greenwichschools.org:             http://webshare.greenwich.k12.ct.us/teplhandbook/Questioning_Example   s.html
Day, R. R., & Park, J-suk. (2005). Developing Reading Comprehension      Questions. Reading in a Foreign Language, 65-67.
Hermida, J. (2009). The Importance of Teaching Academic Reading Skills in         First-Year University Courses. The International Journal of Research         and Review, 23.
Hall, D. (1983). Four Kinds of Reading. Thinking in Writing , 162-167.
Katz, C., & Kaufman, B. (2007). Reading     Diagnosis for Teacher: an      instructional approach. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Khatib, M., & Nasrollahi, A. (2012). Enhancing Reading Comprehension   through Short Stories in Iranian EFL Learners. Theory and Practice in            Language Studies, 242-243.
Mullis, I. V., Kennedy, A. M., Martin, M. O., & Sainsbury, M. (2006).       Assessment Framework and Specifications (2nd ed.). United States:          TIMSS & PIRLS Study Center.
OXford Advanced Learner's Dictionary (10th ed.). (2010). Oxford: Oxford            University Press.
Vacca, J. A., Vacca, R. T., Gove, M. K., Burkey, L. C., Lenhart, L. A., & McKeon, C. A. (2008). Reading and Learning to Read. USA: Pearson             Education Inc.
Read More